Showing posts with label inter-cloud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label inter-cloud. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

The STAR of Cloud Security

The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), a not-for-profit organization with a mission to promote the use of best practices for providing security assurance within Cloud Computing, recently announced that they are launching (Q4 of 2011) a publicly accessible registry that will document the security controls provided by various cloud computing offerings.  The idea is to encourage transparency of security practices within cloud providers and help users evaluate and determine the security of their current cloud provider or a provider they are considering.  The service will be free.

CSA STAR (Security, Trust and Assurance Registry) is open to all cloud providers whether they offer SaaS, PaaS or IaaS and allows them to submit self assessment reports that document compliance in relation to the CSA published best practices.  The CSA says that the searchable registry will allow potential cloud customers to review the security practices of providers, accelerating their due diligence and leading to higher-quality procurement experiences.  There are two different types of reports that the cloud provider can submit to to indicate their compliance with CSA best practices.  The Consensus Assessments Initiative Questionnaire (CAIQ), a 140 question document which provides industry-accepted ways to document what security controls exist in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS offerings and the Cloud Control Matrix (CCM) which provides a controls framework that gives detailed understanding of security concepts and principles that are aligned to the Cloud Security Alliance guidance in areas like ISACA COBIT, PCI, and NIST.

Providers who chose to take part and submit the documents are on the ‘honor system’ since this is a self assessment and users will need to trust that the information is accurate.  CSA is encouraging providers to participate and says, in doing so, they will address some of the most urgent and important security questions buyers are asking, and can dramatically speed up the purchasing process for their services. In addition to self-assessments, CSA will provide a list of providers who have integrated CAIQ and CCM and other components from CSA’s Governance, Risk Management and Compliance (GRC) stack into their compliance management tools.

This should help with those who are still a bit hesitant about Cloud services.  The percentage of those claiming ‘security issues’ as a deterrent for cloud deployments has steadily dropped over the last year.  Last year around this time on any given survey, anywhere from 42% to 73% of those respondents said cloud technology does not provide adequate security safeguards and that that security concerns have prevented their adoption of cloud computing.  In a recent cloud computing study from TheInfoPro, only 13% cited security worries as a cloud roadblock, after up-front costs at 15%.  Big difference than a year ago.  In this most recent survey, they found that ‘fear of change’ to be the biggest hurdle for cloud adoption.  Ahhhh, change.  One of the things most difficult for humans.  Change is constant yet the basics are still the same - education, preparation, and anticipation of what cloud is about and what it can offer is a necessity for success.

ps

References:
Technorati Tags: F5, CSA, integration, cloud computing, Pete Silva, security, business, education, technology, application delivery, cloud, context-aware, infrastructure 2.0, web, internet

Connect with Peter: Connect with F5:
o_linkedin[1] o_rss[1] o_facebook[1] o_twitter[1]   o_facebook[1] o_twitter[1] o_slideshare[1] o_youtube[1]

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

CloudFucius Asks: Will Open Source Open Doors for Cloud Computing?

Konfuzius-1770 There has been a lot of press already about OpenStack’s announcement yesterday about their new open source cloud computing software.  OpenStack says that the goal is, ‘to allow any organization to create and offer cloud computing capabilities using open source software running on standard hardware.’  The software is intended to to allow companies to automatically create and manage large deployments of virtual private servers and remove the concern of vendor lock-in since the software will allow customers to span multiple cloud providers.  Customers and service providers alike can use their own physical hardware to create large cloud environments, public or private, across the globe.  It is also positioned to give customers more choice in how they want their specific cloud environment designed and deployed.  Almost 30 companies are participating with the folks at Rackspace and NASA (Nebula cloud computing platform) leading the charge.

Certainly, there are several attractive pieces to this, including the notion of cloud-standards, but will it finally open the flood gates for mass adoption of Cloud deployments?  Maybe not for the enterprise, at least initially.  Openstack honestly admits, ‘OpenStack is probably not something that the average business would consider deploying themselves yet. The big news for end customers is the potential for a halo effect of providers adopting an open and standard cloud: easy migration, cloud-bursting, better security audits, and a large ecosystem of compatible tools and services that work across cloud providers.’  This means that Openstack is really aimed at *very* technical enterprises (very large with lots of resources) and service providers.  Thus, the play for the enterprise does not exist (yet) here, *except* for management layer players who could leverage it to build something they could sell to enterprises to “make it easy” for them.  (thanks Lori!)

In addition, as Ted Julian of the Yankee Group points out in this story, security is still the great unknown since there doesn’t seem to be a security vendor on the list of Openstack participants.  I’m sure that list will grow over time, especially with the press that it’s getting, and the ever present cloud security concerns will eventually be addressed.  This project is in the very early stages and will continue to evolve as folks pick up the code, test it and decide how it might work for them.  Maybe it’ll also help push along and enable the whole Inter-Cloud notion.

And one from Confucius: The cautious seldom err.

ps

The CloudFucius Series: Intro, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13

Resources:

Technorati Tags: F5, infrastructure 2.0, integration, cloud connect, Pete Silva, security, business, education, technology, application delivery, cloud, context-aware, web, internet, openstack

twitter: @psilvas

Digg This

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

CloudFucius Inspects: Hosts in the Cloud

Konfuzius-1770 So much has been written about all the systems, infrastructure, applications, content and everything else IT related that’s making it’s way to the cloud yet I haven’t seen much discussion (or maybe I just missed it) about all the clients connecting to the cloud to access those systems.  Securing those systems has made some organizations hesitate in deploying IT resources in the cloud whether due to compliance, the sensitivity of the data, the shared infrastructure or simply persuaded by survey results.  Once a system is ‘relatively’ secure, how do you keep it that way when the slew of potentially dangerous, infected clients connect?  With so many different types of users connecting from various devices, and with a need to access vastly different cloud resources, it’s important to inspect every requesting host to ensure both the user and the device can be trusted.  Companies have done this for years with remote/SSL VPN users who request access to internal systems – is antivirus installed and up to date, is a firewall enabled, is the device free of malware and so forth.  Ultimately, the hosts are connecting to servers housed in some data center and all the same precautions you have with your own space should be enforced in the cloud.


Since cloud computing has opened application deployment to the masses, and all that’s required for access is *potentially* just a browser, you must be able to detect not only the type of computer (laptop, mobile device, kiosk, etc.) but also its security posture. IDC predicts that ‘The world's mobile worker population will pass the one billion mark this year and grow to nearly 1.2 billion people – more than a third of the world's workforce – by 2013’  With so many Internet-enabled devices available; a Windows computer, a Linux box, an Apple iteration, a mobile device and anything else with an IP address, they could all be trying to gain access to your cloud environment at any given moment.  It might be necessary to inspect each of these before granting users access in order to make sure it’s something you want to allow.  If the inspection fails, how should you fix the problem so that the user can have some level of access?  If the requesting host is admissible, how do you determine what they are authorized to access?  And, if you allow a user and their device, what is the guarantee that nothing proprietary either gets taken or left behind?  The key is to make sure that only “safe” systems are allowed to access your cloud infrastructure, especially if it contains highly sensitive information and context helps with that.

One of the first steps to accomplishing this is to chart usage scenarios. Working in conjunction with the security policy, it is essential to uncover the usage scenarios and access modes for the various types of users and the many devices that they might be using.  The chart will probably vary based on your company’s and/or website’s Acceptable Use Policy, but this exercise gets administrators started in determining the endpoint plan.  Sounds a lot like a remote access policy, huh, with one exception.  Usually there is a notion of ‘trusted’ and ‘un-trusted’  with remote access.  If a user requests access from a corporate issued laptop, often that’s considered a trusted device since there is something identifiable to classify it as an IT asset.  These days, with so many personal devices entering the cloud, all hosts should be considered un-trusted until they prove otherwise.  And as inter-clouds become reality, you’ll need to make sure that a client coming from someone else’s infrastructure abides by your requirements.  Allowing an infected device access to your cloud infrastructure can be just as bad as allowing an invalid user access to proprietary internal information.  This is where endpoint security checks can take over. Endpoint security prevents infected PCs, hosts, or users from connecting to your cloud environment.  Automatic re-routing for infected PCs reduces Help Desk calls and prevents sensitive data from being snooped by keystroke loggers and malicious programs.

Simply validating a user is no longer the starting point for determining access to cloud systems; the requesting device should get the first review.  Pre-access checks can run prior to the actual logon (if there is one) page appearing, so if the client is not in compliance, they won’t even get the chance to enter credentials.  These checks can determine if antivirus or firewall is running, if it is up-to-date, and more.  Systems can direct the user to a remediation page for further instructions to gain access. It’s easy to educate the user as to why the failure occurred and relay the possible steps to resolve the problem.  For example: “We noticed you have antivirus installed but not running. Please enable your antivirus software for access.”  Or, rather than deny logon and communicate a detailed remedy, you could automatically send them to a remediation website designed to correct or update the client’s software environment, assuring policies required for access are satisfied without any user interaction.  Inspectors can look for certain registry keys or files that are part of your corporate computer build/image to determine if this is a corporate asset and thus, which system resources are allowed.  Pre-access checks can retrieve extended Windows and Internet Explorer info to ensure certain patches are in place.  If, based on those checks, the system finds a non-compliant client but an authorized user; you might be able to initiate a secure, protected, virtual workspace for that session.
As the ever-expanding cloud network grows, the internal corporate resources require the most protection as it’s always been.  Most organizations don’t necessarily want all users’ devices to have access to all resources all the time.  Working in conjunction with the pre-access sequence, controllers can gather device information (like IP address or time of day) and determine if a resource should be offered.  A protected configuration measures risk factors using information collected by the pre-access check; thus, they work in conjunction.  For example, Fake Company, Inc. (FCI) has some contractors who need access to Fake Company’s corporate cloud.  While this is not an issue during work hours, FCI does not want them accessing the system after business hours.  The controller can check the time if a contractor tries to log on at 2 AM; it knows the contractor’s access is only available during FCI’s regular business hours and can deny access.

Post-access actions can protect against sensitive information being “left” on the client.  The controller can impose a cache-cleaner to eliminate any user residue such as browser history, forms, cookies, auto-complete information, and more.  For systems unable to install a cleanup control, you can block all file downloads to avoid the possibility of the inadvertent left-behind temporary file—yet still allow access to needed cloud applications.  These actions are especially important when allowing non-recognized machines access without wanting them to take any data with them after the session.

In summary: First, inspect the requesting device; second, protect resources based on the data gathered during the check; third, make sure no session residue is left behind.  Security is typically a question of trust. Is there sufficient trust to allow a particular user and a particular device full access to enterprise cloud resources?  Endpoint security gives the enterprise the ability to verify how much trust and determine whether the client can get all the cloud resources, some of the cloud resources, or just left in the rain.
And one from Confucius: When you know a thing, to hold that you know it; and when you do not know a thing, to allow that you do not know it - this is knowledge.

ps

The CloudFucius Series: Intro, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Related:
Technorati Tags: F5, infrastructure 2.0, integration, cloud connect, Pete Silva, security, business, education, technology, application delivery, intercloud, cloud, context-aware, infrastructure 2.0, automation, web, internet, blog, law

twitter: @psilvas
Digg This

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

The Inter-Cloud: Will MAE become a MAC?

600_cloud_over_beach If public, private, hybrid, cumulus, stratus wasn’t enough, the ‘Inter-Cloud’ concept came up again at the Cloud Connect gathering in San Jose last week.  According to the Wikipedia entry, it was first introduced in 2007 by Kevin Kelly, both Lori MacVittie and Greg Ness wrote about the Intercloud last June and many reference James Urquhart in bringing it to everyone’s attention.  Since there is no real interoperability between clouds, what happens when one cloud instance wants to reference a service in another cloud?  Enter the Inter-Cloud.  As with most things related to cloud computing, there has been lots of debate about exactly what it is, what it’s supposed to do and when it’s time will come

In the Infrastructure Interoperability in a Cloudy World’ session at Cloud Connect, the Inter-Cloud was referenced as the ‘transition point’ when applications in a particular cloud need to move.  Application mobility comes into play with Cloud Balancing, Cloud Bursting, disaster recovery, sensitive data in private/application in public and any other scenario where application fluidity is desired and/or required.  An Inter-Cloud is, in essence, a mesh of different cloud infrastructures governed by standards that allow them to interoperate.  As ISPs were building out their own private backbones in the 1990’s, the Internet needed a way to connect all the autonomous systems to exchange traffic.  The Network Access Points (NAPs) and Metropolitan Area Ethernets (now Exchange – MAE East/MAE West/etc) became today’s Internet Exchange Points (IXP).  Granted, the agreed standard for interoperability, TCP/IP and specifically BGP, made that possible and we’re still waiting on something like that for the cloud; plus we’re now dealing with huge chunks of data (images, systems, etc) rather than simple email or light web browsing.  I would imagine that the major cloud providers already have connections the major peering points and someday there just might be the Metro Area Clouds (MAC West, MAC East, MAC Central) and other cloud peering locations for application mobility.  Maybe cloud providers with similar infrastructures (running a particular hypervisor on certain hardware with specific services) will start with private peering, like the ISPs of yore. 

The reality is that it probably won’t happen that way since clouds are already part of the internet, the needs of the cloud are different and an agreed method is far from completion.  It is still interesting to envision though.  I also must admit, I had completely forgotten about the Inter-Cloud and you hear me calling it the ‘Intra-Cloud’ in this interview with Lori at Cloud Connect.  Incidentally, it’s fun to read articles from 1999 talking about the Internet’s ‘early days’ of ISP Peering and those from today on how it has changed over the years. 

ps

Related:

Technorati Tags: MacVittie, F5, infrastructure 2.0, integration, collaboration, standards, cloud connect, Pete Silva, F5, security, application security, network security, business, education, technology, application delivery, intercloud, cloud, greg Ness, context-aware, infrastructure 2.0, automation, context, web, internet, blog

Digg This